4.8 Article

Targeting dendritic cells in lymph node with an antigen peptide-based nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 171-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.008

关键词

Cancer immunotherapy; Nanovaccine; Antigen delivery; Lymph node; Dendritic cell targeting

资金

  1. Major Research plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91442201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172153]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61421064]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2015ZDTD014]
  5. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics of Southeast University
  6. Director Fund of WNLO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design of peptide-based subunit vaccine formulations for the direct delivery of tumor antigen peptides (Aps) to dendritic cells (DCs) localized within draining lymph nodes (DLNs) is challenging. Mature DCs (mDCs) are abundantly distributed within DLNs but have dramatically reduced endocytic uptake and antigen-processing abilities, so their role as potential vaccine targets has been largely overlooked. Here we report an ultra-small biocompatible nanovaccine (alpha-Ap-FNP) functionalized by avidly targeting delivery of Ap via the scavenger receptor class B1 (SR-B1) pathway to mDCs. The self-assembly, small size (similar to 30 nm), SR-B1-targeting and optical properties of alpha-Ap-FNP resulted in its efficient Ap loading, substantial LN accumulation, targeting of mDCs and enhanced Ap presentation, and fluorescence trafficking, respectively. We also demonstrate that the alpha-Ap-FNP can be either used alone or encapsulated with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide as a prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine. Thus, the excellent properties of alpha-Ap-FNP provide it potential for clinical applications as a potent nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据