4.8 Article

Gold nanoparticles-based SPECT/CT imaging probe targeting for vulnerable atherosclerosis plaques

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 71-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.048

关键词

Annexin V; Gold nanoparticles; SPECT/CT; Apoptotic macrophages; Vulnerable atherosclerosis plaques

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271608, 81471706]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [XYQ2013106]
  3. Science Foundation of Shanghai [13ZR1439200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to realize accurate localization and precise evaluation of vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques via dual-modal imaging, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) were firstly caped with a thin amino-PEGs cover and then conjugated with the targeting molecular Annexin V and radionuclide Tc-99m simultaneously to form SPECK/CT imaging probe targeting apoptotic macrophages. The as-synthesized Tc-99m-GNPs-Annexin V was with uniform size (30.2 +/- 2.9 nm) and high labeling rate (98.9 +/- 0.5%) and stability. Targeting ability of Annexin V for apoptotic macrophages was kept and enhanced. For macrophages with 30% apoptosis, cellular uptakes of 3.52 +/- 0.35% for Tc-99m-GNPs-Annexin V, 2.41 +/- 0.53% for Tc-99m-GNPs and 1.68 +/- 0.36% for Tc-99m-Annexin V were achieved after 2 h incubation. ApoE knock out mice with high fat diet-induced atherosclerosis were scanned via Tc-99m-GNPs-Annexin V SPECT/CT. With the introduction of targeting molecules, imaging probe was more efficient in accumulating in apoptotic macrophages. In practical evaluation, CT helps to restrict the lesions depiction more accurately, meanwhile, SPECK imaging intensity correlated with pathological changes tightly. In conclusion, Annexin V-modified hybrid gold nanoparticles were successfully synthesized, and this imaging system helped to better localize and diagnose those vulnerable AS plaques via specific targeting the apoptotic macrophages. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据