4.8 Article

The tissue-engineered human cornea as a model to study expression of matrix metalloproteinases during corneal wound healing

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 86-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.006

关键词

Tissue-engineering; Biomaterial; Cornea; Wound healing; Matrix metalloproteinase; Extracellular matrix; Gene expression

资金

  1. 'Canadian Institutes of Health Research' (CIHR) [MOP-53170]
  2. Roseau de Recherche en Sante de la Vision from the 'Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante' (FRQS)
  3. FRQS
  4. Canadian Research Chair on Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corneal injuries remain a major cause of consultation in the ophthalmology clinics worldwide. Repair of corneal wounds is a complex mechanism that involves cell death, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. In the present study, we used a tissue-engineered, two layers (epithelium and stroma) human cornea as a biomaterial to study both the cellular and molecular mechanisms of wound healing. Gene profiling on microarrays revealed important alterations in the pattern of genes expressed by tissue-engineered corneas in response to wound healing. Expression of many MMPs-encoding genes was shown by microarray and qPCR analyses to increase in the migrating epithelium of wounded corneas. Many of these enzymes were converted into their enzymatically active form as wound closure proceeded. In addition, expression of MMPs by human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) was affected both by the stromal fibroblasts and the collagen-enriched ECM they produce. Most of all, results from mass spectrometry analyses provided evidence that a fully stratified epithelium is required for proper synthesis and organization of the ECM on which the epithelial cells adhere. In conclusion, and because of the many characteristics it shares with the native cornea, this human two layers corneal substitute may prove particularly useful to decipher the mechanistic details of corneal wound healing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据