4.4 Article

Long-term impact of catheter ablation on arrhythmia burden in low-risk patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The CLOSE to CURE study

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 535-543

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.11.004

关键词

Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Burden; Insertable cardiac monitor; Pulmonary vein isolation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Few studies evaluated the impact of catheter ablation (CA) on atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) burden in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE In the prospective, patient-controlled CLOSE to CURE study, we determined the longer-term impact of optimized CA on ATA burden by using an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). METHODS A total of 105 patients with paroxysmal AF were implanted with an ICM 65 (interquartile range [IQR] 61-78) days before CA. CA consisted of contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation targeting an intertag distance of <= 6 mm and a region-specific ablation index. The primary end point was reduction in ICM-detected ATA burden; secondary end points were single-procedure freedom from ATA, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS The mean age was 62 6 8 years; the median CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 1 (IQR 1-2); and the median left atrial diameter was 43 (IQR 39-43) mm. After pulmonary vein isolation (1.13 +/- 0.39 procedures per patient), median ATA burden decreased from 2.68% (IQR 0.09%-15.02%) at baseline to 0% (IQR 0%-0%) during the first year and to 0% (IQR 0%-0%) during the second year (reduction in ATA burden 100% [IQR 100%-100%]; P<.001). Single-procedure freedom from any ATA was 87% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years. Quality of life improved significantly across all scores. Adverse events occurred in 5 patients (4.8%). CONCLUSION CA has become an effective procedure in paroxysmal AF, with a major impact on ICM-detected ATA burden. Whereas conventional survival analysis suggests a progressive decline in efficacy, we observed that burden reduction is maintained at longer follow-up. These data imply that ATA burden is a more optimal end point for assessing ablation efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据