4.7 Article

Detailed kinetic mechanism of gas-phase reactions of volatiles released from biomass pyrolysis

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 60-71

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.015

关键词

Biomass pyrolysis; Biomass gasification; Fast pyrolysis; Lumped mechanism; Bio-oil; Tars

资金

  1. European Union [654650]
  2. CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil-Science without Borders Mobility Program-Full PhD Scholarship [10131/13-2]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [654650] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive chemical models to describe the behavior of biomass pyrolysis, gasification and combustion are crucial for the simulation and design of thermochemical processes of ligno-cellulosic materials. Despite this importance, reliable and predictive models are still not well known. The original aspect of this work is to present a comprehensive and predictive model of pyrolysis, gasification, and combustion, starting from biomass characterization, through the description of released volatiles at the particle scale, until the effect of the secondary gas-phase reactions at the reactor scale. All these aspects can play a relevant role in the biomass thermo-valorization processes. Most of released species from biomass devolatilization are oxygenated hydrocarbons. This study aims at identifying some reference rate parameters, based on analogy and thermochemistry rules, for the different reaction classes. Once rate rules are defined, they allow an easy extension to analogous compounds. In this way, the kinetic mechanism already developed for jet and diesel fuels is extended to the new tar species released by biomasses. Despite unavoidable approximations when the interest is also at the reactor scale, this model is the only one, to our knowledge, able to describe the whole process from biomass to final products, in a predictive and satisfactory way. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据