4.6 Article

Recurrence and survival rates in node negative patients after sentinel node biopsy for early-stage vulva cancer - A nationwide study

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 156, 期 1, 页码 124-130

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.024

关键词

Vulva cancer; Sentinel Node procedure; Isolated groin recurrence; Survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The sentinel node (SN) procedure is adopted in selected patients with early-stage vulva cancer (VC) in Denmark. Due to the low incidence of VC, large population-based studies on the safety of SN outside multicenter clinical trials are lacking. The current study evaluated the risk of recurrence and survival in SN- negative VC patients. Methods: Nationwide data was collected and registered prospectively in the Danish Gynecologic Cancer Database from January 2011 to July 2017. Patients with clinically stage IB-II unifocal vulva squamous cell carcinoma, tumor <4 cm and no clinically suspicious groin nodes or distant metastases, who underwent SN-procedure, were included. Results: The SN-procedure was performed in 286 patients, of these 190 (66.4%) patients were SN-negative. Twenty-three of the 190 SN-negative patients (12.1%) had one or more recurrences during a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1-83). Four patients (2.1%) had an isolated groin recurrence identified from 5 to 17 months after primary surgery. Fourteen patients (7.4%) experienced a local recurrence in vulva, I patient (0.5%) had a recurrence in the vulva and the groin and 4 patients (2.1%) had distant recurrences. The 3-year overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) for SN-negative patients was 84% and 93%, respectively. The 3-year OS for patients with recurrent disease was 58%. Conclusions: This is the largest prospective nationwide study on SN-procedure in vulva cancer. The study confirms the safety of the SN-procedure in selected early-stage VC patients with a low isolated groin recurrence rate and a good DSS. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据