4.7 Article

The effects of physical and chemical preprocessing on the flowability of corn stover

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 126-134

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.015

关键词

Biomass; Feedstock; Flowability; Shear; Rheology; Hopper design

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08-GO28308]
  2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory and through the Office of the Biomass Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continuous and reliable feeding of biomass is essential for successful biofuel production. However, the challenges associated with biomass solids handling are commonly overlooked. In this study, we examine the effects of preprocessing (particle size reduction, moisture content, chemical additives, etc.) on the flow properties of corn stover. Compressibility, flow properties (interparticle friction, cohesion, unconfined yield stress, etc.), and wall friction were examined for five corn stover samples: ground, milled (dry and wet), acid impregnated, and deacetylated. The ground corn stover was found to be the least compressible and most flowable material. The water and acid impregnated stovers had similar compressibilities. Yet, the wet corn stover was less flowable than the acid impregnated sample, which displayed a flow index equivalent to the dry, milled corn stover. The deacetylated stover, on the other hand, was the most compressible and least flowable examined material. However, all of the tested stover samples had internal friction angles > 30 degrees, which could present additional feeding and handling challenges. All of the wetted materials (water, acid, and deacetylated) displayed reduced flowabilities (excluding the acid impregnated sample), and enhanced compressibilities and wall friction angles, indicating the potential for added handling issues; which was corroborated via theoretical hopper design calculations. All of the wetted corn stovers require larger theoretical hopper outlet diameters and steeper hopper walls than the examined dry stovers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据