4.0 Article

ALS deficiency caused by an exon 2 deletion and a novel missense variant in the gene encoding ALS

期刊

GROWTH HORMONE & IGF RESEARCH
卷 48-49, 期 -, 页码 5-8

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2019.07.002

关键词

ALS-IGF; Insulin-like growth factor I; Short stature; Delayed puberty; Growth hormone

资金

  1. Paediatrics Division, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile [DIVPED001-2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: ALS deficiency (ACLSD), caused by mutations in IGFALS, is characterized by a mild short stature, low concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and a normal growth hormone (GH) stimulation test response. To our knowledge, no larger deletions have been reported. Case description: A 17-year-old adolescent male was evaluated due to delayed puberty and short stature. He had a height of 154.4 cm (SDS -2.84), a weight of 53.3 kg (SDS -1.41), a BMI of 22.4 kg/m2 (SDS +0.31), a Tanner 2 pubertal stage with a testicular volume of 10 mL, and a bone age of 16 years (SDS -1.33). After biochemical evaluation, low IGF-I levels, undetectable IGFBP-3 levels, and a normal response to the GH stimulation test were observed, suggesting GH insensitivity. ACLSD was confirmed by ALS measurement (116 ng/mL, SDS -3.19) and genetic analysis of IGFALS. An apparently homozygous missense variant, p. Pro624Leu, was found in exon 2 of the proband; this mutation was observed on one allele of the proband's father but was absent in the mother and siblings. Deletion/duplication analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was consistent with a deletion encompassing a significant part of exon 2 on one allele in the proband and in his mother and siblings. Conclusion: This is the first report of a large deletion in a patient with ACLSD. Deletion/duplication analysis should be considered in the genetic study of ACLSD, especially when homozygosity for a pathogenic variant cannot be confirmed by the study of the parents or when no variants are found but ALS concentrations are very low.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据