4.7 Article

Using pyrolytic acid leaching as a pretreatment step in a biomass fast pyrolysis plant: Process design and economic evaluation

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 388-404

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.07.003

关键词

Fast pyrolysis; Acid leaching; Alkali and alkaline earth metals; Pyrolytic sugars; Process design; Techno-economic evaluation

资金

  1. Smart Mix Program of the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation
  2. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Removing alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEMs) from biomass, with pyrolytic acids, before pyrolysis leads to increased organic oil and sugar yields. These pyrolytic acids are produced and concentrated within the pyrolysis process itself. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate under which conditions acid leaching of pinewood, bagasse and straw can improve the technical and economic feasibility of a pyrolysis process. Therefore, a preliminary process design for the implementation of acid leaching at a pyrolysis plant, with a biomass capacity of 5 and 50 t h(-1), was made and compared with a pyrolysis plant using the untreated biomass. Target products were heating oil and/or additional pyrolytic sugars. It has been calculated that with the leaching step the heat for pyrolysis and drying of the biomass can still be supplied by the combustion of the char and gases, but insufficient excess heat is available to produce electricity for the process. Critical for the economics of the acid leaching pyrolysis process are the amount of extractives in the biomass (organics ending up in the waste water) but not its moisture content. Mechanical dewatering before thermal drying turns out to be very important. The economics of the presented approach turned out to be very sensitive to the plant scale, CAPEX and obviously to the biomass price. At the current market scenario and state of proven techniques the production of sugars and heating oil from bagasse at 50 t h(-1) is the most economic option (IRR 15.4%). (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据