4.6 Article

Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 245-257

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8

关键词

copy-number variant; interpretation; classification; CNV; scoring metric

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) [U41HG006834, U41HG009649, U41HG009650]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Copy-number analysis to detect disease-causing losses and gains across the genome is recommended for the evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies, as well as for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. In the decade that this analysis has been in widespread clinical use, tremendous strides have been made in understanding the effects of copy-number variants (CNVs) in both affected individuals and the general population. However, continued broad implementation of array and next-generation sequencing-based technologies will expand the types of CNVs encountered in the clinical setting, as well as our understanding of their impact on human health. Methods To assist clinical laboratories in the classification and reporting of CNVs, irrespective of the technology used to identify them, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has developed the following professional standards in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) project. Results This update introduces a quantitative, evidence-based scoring framework; encourages the implementation of the five-tier classification system widely used in sequence variant classification; and recommends uncoupling the evidence-based classification of a variant from its potential implications for a particular individual. Conclusion These professional standards will guide the evaluation of constitutional CNVs and encourage consistency and transparency across clinical laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据