4.7 Article

Optimisation of bio-oil production by hydrothermal liquefaction of agro-industrial residues: Blackcurrant pomace (Ribes nigrum L.) as an example

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 273-285

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.10.012

关键词

Hydrothermal liquefaction; Food processing residues; Blackcurrant pomace; Bio-oil; Batch reactor

资金

  1. French Research National Agency ANR (LIQHYD project) [ANR-12-BIME-0003]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-12-BIME-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports bio-oil production by hydrothermal liquefaction of blackcurrant pomace (Ribes nigrum L), a fruit residue obtained after berry pressing. The bio-oil has a higher heating value of 35.9 MJ kg(-1) and low ash content, which makes it suitable for energy applications. We report the influence of process parameters on yields and carbon distribution between products: temperature (563-608 K), holding time (0-240 min), mass fraction of dry biomass in the slurry (0.05-0.29), and initial pH (3.1-12.8) by adding sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Depending on the experiments, the bio-oil accounts for at least 24% mass fraction of the initial dry biomass, while char yields ranges from 24 to 40%. A temperature of 583 K enhances the bio-oil yield, up to 30%, while holding time does not have a significant influence on the results. Increasing biomass concentrations decreases bio-oil yields from 29% to 24%. Adding sodium hydroxide decreases the char yield from 35% at pH = 3.1 (without NaOH) to 24% at pH = 12.8. It also increases the bio-oil yield and carbon transfer to the aqueous phase. Thermogravimetric analysis shows that a 43% mass fraction of the bio-oil boils in the medium naphtha petroleum fraction range. The bio-oil is highly acidic and unsaturated, and its dynamic viscosity is high (1.7 Pa sat 298 K), underlining the need for further upgrading before any use for fuel applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据