4.6 Review

A review of thermochemical upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil: Techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, and technology readiness

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 4-18

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12658

关键词

biomass; bio-oil upgrading; fast pyrolysis; prospective life cycle assessment; techno-economic analysis; technology readiness

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-EE0006288]
  2. OxEon Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technologies for upgrading fast pyrolysis bio-oil to drop-in fuels and coproducts are under development and show promise for decarbonizing energy supply for transportation and chemicals markets. The successful commercialization of these fuels and the technologies deployed to produce them depend on production costs, scalability, and yield. To meet environmental regulations, pyrolysis-based biofuels need to adhere to life cycle greenhouse gas intensity standards relative to their petroleum-based counterparts. We review literature on fast pyrolysis bio-oil upgrading and explore key metrics that influence their commercial viability through life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) methods together with technology readiness level (TRL) evaluation. We investigate the trade-offs among economic, environmental, and technological metrics derived from these methods for individual technologies as a means of understanding their nearness to commercialization. Although the technologies reviewed have not attained commercial investment, some have been pilot tested. Predicting the projected performance at scale-up through models can, with industrial experience, guide decision-making to competitively meet energy policy goals. LCA and TEA methods that ensure consistent and reproducible models at a given TRL are needed to compare alternative technologies. This study highlights the importance of integrated analysis of multiple economic, environmental, and technological metrics for understanding performance prospects and barriers among early stage technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据