4.5 Article

A transcriptomic study of selenium against liver injury induced by beta-cypermethrin in mice by RNA-seq

期刊

FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 343-353

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-019-00719-7

关键词

Selenium; Liver injury; RNA sequencing; Genes; Pathways

资金

  1. Tackle key Problem Project in Science and Technology in Anhui Province, China [1501041177]
  2. Promoting Project for Team Construction of Anhui Province, China [Y05201374]
  3. Natural Science Foundation Project of Anhui Province [1508085QC63, 1908085MC87]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation
  5. Academic & Technology Leaders Introduction Project
  6. 211 Project of Anhui University [10117700023]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of China [81570376, 81870307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence from biochemical liver function index and histopathology analysis suggested that selenium could effectively repair the liver injury caused by beta-cypermethrin (beta-CYP). However, the molecular mechanism of selenium against liver injury induced by beta-CYP remains unclear. In the present study, dynamic changes in gene expression profiles before and after the treatment of Na2SeO3 in liver injury mice were analyzed by using RNA sequencing. As a result, several essential genes and pathways were identified to be significantly associated with this process. In particular, ten genes including Cyp2j11, Cyp2b10, Cyp3a13, Dhrs9, Socs2, Stat4, Gm13305, Cyp3a44, Retsat, and Cyp26b1 were significantly enriched in the functional categories related to retinol metabolism, linoleic acid metabolism, and Jak-STAT signaling pathway. Among them, the expression patterns of nine genes were validated by qRT-PCR, except for Cyp3a44. Furthermore, we have constructed the associated regulatory network based on the identified targets revealed by high throughput screening. Our study may provide insight into the molecular mechanism underlying the protective effect of selenium against liver injury induced by beta-CYP in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据