4.7 Article

Molecular simulation study on the rheological properties of a pH-responsive clean fracturing fluid system

期刊

FUEL
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 677-684

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.027

关键词

Wormlike micelles; Clean fracturing fluid; Molecular dynamics simulations; pH-Responsive

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51704314, 41776029]
  2. Science Funds for Doctoral Fund of Shandong Province [ZR201702170502]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [18CX02167A]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171262]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [18KJB440003]
  6. Lianyungang Huaguoshan Talent Program
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Huaihai Institute of Technology [Z2017006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rheological properties of a pH-sensitive clean fracturing fluid system formed by the anionic surfactant N-hexadecyl iminodiacetic acid (HIA), which has two carboxyl groups, and salt-free cationic hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) have been carefully studied. Viscoelastic wormlike micelles (WLMs) were prepared in a HIA/CTAB hybrid system. The increased electrostatic interactions between the heads of HIA and CTAB lead to a structural transition from spheres to WLMs as a function of pH. Large-scale coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) revealed that the formation of WLMs can be described in three stages: oligomer-to-sphere fusion; sphere-to-rod fusion; and 'rod-to-rod fusion. The simulation results show that electrostatic repulsion occurs among the carboxyl groups of HIA and that HIA is screened by the positively charged heads of CTAB, which leads to an increase in solution viscosity. The excellent rheological properties and pH sensitivity of the clean fracturing fluid significantly improve the seaming capacity and reservoir protection of the fracturing fluid, thus helping to increase the productivity of the well after fracturing and control the construction cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据