4.7 Article

Minor increases in Phyllostachys edulis (Moso bamboo) biomass despite evident alterations of soil bacterial community structure after phosphorus fertilization alone: Based on field studies at different altitudes

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 451, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117561

关键词

Moso bamboo; P fertilization; Altitudes; Soil microorganism; Illumina HiSeq sequencing

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31560204]
  2. Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the relationships among bamboo growth, soil microbial community and phosphorus (P) fertilization may shed new light on the optimization of P application rate and ecological function of P nutrient in forest ecosystem. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of P fertilizations (25 and 50 kg P ha(-1)) on Phyllostachys edulis (Moso bamboo) growths, soil nutrient contents and microbial properties at different altitudes (300 and 800 m) and to link Moso bamboo growths with abiotic and biotic factors. Compared with the blank control, P fertilizations alone generated negligible impacts on the increases of Moso bamboo biomass and soil available P contents. Bacterial and fungal community diversities kept relatively stable after P fertilizations. Contrastingly, relative to the control, 25 kg P ha(-1) application significantly enhanced the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and changed bacterial community structure at low altitude. At low and high altitudes, 50 kg P ha(-1) applications significantly increased the relative abundances of Ascomycota. The Moso bamboo growth might be stimulated by the increases of soil total nitrogen, available P, Proteobacteria and Ascomycota. Our results demonstrated that P fertilization alone significantly changed soil bacterial community structure but generated negligibly stimulating role in the increase of Moso bamboo biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据