4.7 Article

Improved Mechanical Properties and Sustained Release Behavior of Cationic Cellulose Nanocrystals Reinforeced Cationic Cellulose Injectable Hydrogels

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 2839-2848

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00646

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473128, 51273151, 81471789]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2015AA020313]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polysaccharide-based injectable hydrogels have several advantages in the context of biomedical use. However, the main obstruction associated with the utilization of these hydrogels in clinical application is their poor mechanical properties. Herein, we describe in situ gelling of nanocomposite hydrogels based on quaternized cellulose (QC) and rigid rod-like cationic cellulose nanocrystals (CCNCs), which can overcome,this challenge. In all cases, gelation immediately occurred with an increase of temperature, and the CCNCs were evenly distributed, throughout the hydrogels. The nanocomposite hydrogels exhibited increasing orders-of-magnitude in-the mechanical strength, high extension in degradation and the sustained release time, because of the strong interaction between CCNCs and QC chains mediated by the cross-linking agent (beta-glycerophosphate, beta-GP). The results of the in vitro toxicity and in vivo biocompatibility tests revealed that the hydrogels did :not show obvious cytotoxicity and inflammatory reaction to cells and tissue: Moreover, DOX-encapsulated hydrogels were injected beside the tumors of mice bearing liver cancer xenografts to assess the potential utility as localized and sustained drug delivery depot systems for anticancer therapy. The results suggested that the QC/CCNC/beta-GP nanocomposite hydrogels had great potential for application in subcutaneous and sustained delivery of anticancer drug to increase therapeutic efficacy and improve patient compliance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据