4.5 Review

Clinical utility of emerging biomarkers in prostate cancer liquid biopsies

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 219-230

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1675515

关键词

Androgens; biomarkers; cell-free tumor DNA; circulating tumor cell; exosomes; liquid biopsy; long non-coding RNA; microRNA; prostate cancer; therapy response

资金

  1. Alpe d'HuZes grant of the Dutch Cancer Society [EMCR2015-8022]
  2. ZonMw, The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, as part of the Goed Gebruik Geneesmiddelen GGG program [836041013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men and a major cause of cancer deaths among men worldwide. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) monitoring and histopathological examination of tumor biopsies remain gold standards in PCa diagnostics. These clinical parameters are not well suited for patient stratification, predicting and monitoring treatment response. On the other hand, liquid biopsies offer a unique opportunity to easily isolate tumor-derived material for longitudinal clinical assessment. Areas covered: In this review we focus on the clinical application of novel liquid biomarkers that have the potential to monitor and stratify patients in order to achieve better therapeutic effects and improve clinical outcomes. Enumeration and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets, exosomes, and cell-free nucleic acids have been studied for their clinical utility in PCa diagnostics, prognostics, monitoring treatment response and guiding treatment choice. Expert opinion: Liquid biomarkers have high potential to be used for prognosis, monitoring treatment response and guiding treatment selection. Although there is a remarkable progress in PCa biomarker discovery, their clinical validation is very limited. Research should be focused on biomarker validation and the incorporation of these biomarkers in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据