4.5 Review

Why hasn't there been more progress in new Chagas disease drug discovery?

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 145-158

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1681394

关键词

Chagas disease; drugs; neglected disease; Trypanosoma cruzi

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [Ed.124/2013, Ed. 15/2015]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (MCTI-CNPq) [14/2015]
  4. Fundacao Nacional de Desenvolvimento de Ensino Superior Particular - Brasil (FUNADESP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected disease caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. In terms of novel drug discovery, there has been no progress since the 1960s with the same two drugs, benznidazole and nifurtimox, still in use. The complex life cycle, genetic diversity of T. cruzi strains, different sensitivities to the available drugs, as well as little interest from pharmaceutical companies and inadequate methodologies for translating in vitro and in vivo findings to the discovery of new drugs have all contributed to the lack of progress. Areas covered: In this perspective, the authors give discussion to the relevant points connected to the lack of developments in CD drug discovery and provide their expert perspectives. Expert opinion: There are few drugs currently in the preclinical pipeline for the treatment of CD. Only three classes of compounds have been shown to achieve high cure rates in mouse models of infection: nitroimidazoles (fexinidazole), oxaborole DNDi-6148 and proteasome inhibitors (GNF6702). New biomarkers for Chagas' disease are urgently needed for the diagnosis and detection of cure/treatment efficacy. Efforts from academia and pharmaceutical companies are in progress and more intense interaction to accelerate the process of new drugs development is necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据