4.2 Article

Evolutionary History and Not Heterochronic Modifications Associated with Viviparity Drive Head Shape Differentiation in a Reproductive Polymorphic Species, Salamandra salamandra

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-019-09489-3

关键词

Development; Geometric morphometrics; Head shape; Intraspecific diversity; Life-history; Pueriparity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying the evolutionary processes that underlie morphological variation at the intraspecific level is cornerstone for understanding the drivers of phenotypic diversity at higher macro-evolutionary scales. The fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra, exhibits exceptional intraspecific variation in multiple phenotypic traits (i.e. body size, head shape, coloration, reproductive modes). Pueriparity (females laying fully metamorphosed juveniles) in S. salamandra entails modifications during embryonic development in comparison to larviparity (females laying aquatic larvae), which is the ancestral reproductive mode. These heterochronic modifications involve a general acceleration of development and mainly focus on cephalic structures to facilitate intrauterine active feeding, which might impact head shape in the adult stage. In the present study, we (i) describe the main features of head shape variation in adults of the two distinct subspecies of Salamandra salamandra that independently evolved to pueriparity, and (ii) explore the morphological consequences of developmental and functional changes related to this major evolutionary shift. Our results show that evolutionary history, and not reproductive mode, is the main driver of head shape variation in S. salamandra. These results suggest different evolutionary processes acting differentially on each subspecies, at least at the adult stage. The present study highlights the importance of comparative studies integrating evolutionary histories and ontogenetic trajectories to explore the different sources of observed morphological diversification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据