4.3 Article

Beneficial Effects of Sagacious Confucius' Pillow Elixir on Cognitive Function in Senescence-Accelerated P8 Mice (SAMP8) via the NLRP3/Caspase-1 Pathway

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2019/3097923

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [81904307]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine [201838]
  3. Young and Middle-aged Teachers Scientific Research Project of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine [2017001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sagacious Confucius' Pillow Elixir (SCPE) is a traditional Chinese medicine that is mainly used for cognitive impairment in aging; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Aging is one of the most important pathogenic factors leading to inflammation and pyroptosis in the hippocampus, which may be a potential mechanism in elderly patients with cognitive impairment. Here, we examined whether SCPE could improve cognitive impairment in SAMP8 mice by reducing hippocampal inflammation and pyroptosis. Seven-month-old senescence-accelerated P8 mice (SAMP8) received SCPE (2.3g/kg/day; 4.6g/kg/day; 9.2g/kg/day) for 28days. Cognitive function and morphometric examinations were performed followed by water maze testing, hematoxylin-eosin staining, Congo red staining, toluidine blue staining, and TUNEL analysis of hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions. Escape latency increased and times across platforms decreased in SAMP8 mice; however, both of them were normalized by SCPE after 28 days. Aging caused significant pyroptosis in hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions, as evidenced by neuronal degeneration and necrosis, amyloid deposition, and decreased Nissl body amounts after cognitive impairment, which were greatly improved by SCPE. SCPE reduced serum IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-alpha levels and reduced hippocampal NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, GSDM-D, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-18, and A beta expression. Thus, SCPE exerts an antipyroptotic effect in aging, mainly by suppressing the NLRP3/caspase-1 signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据