4.7 Article

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 778-788

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06457-5

关键词

Breast; Mammography; Deep learning; Neural network (computer); Classification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81874216, 81728016]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0112900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the impact of utilizing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) or/and full-field digital mammography (FFDM), and different transfer learning strategies on deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based mass classification for breast cancer. Methods We retrospectively collected 441 patients with both DBT and FFDM on which regions of interest (ROIs) covering the malignant, benign and normal tissues were extracted for DCNN training and validation. Experiments were conducted for tasks in distinguishing malignant/benign/normal: (1) classification capabilities of DBT vs FFDM and the role of transfer learning were validated on 2D-DCNN; (2) different strategies of combining DBT and FFDM and the associated impacts on classification were explored; (3) 2D-DCNN and 3D-DCNN trained from scratch with volumetric DBT were compared. Results 2D-DCNN with transfer learning outperformed that without for DBT in distinguishing malignant (Delta AUC = 0.059 +/- 0.009, p < 0.001), benign (Delta AUC = 0.095 +/- 0.010, p < 0.001) and normal tissue (Delta AUC = 0.042 +/- 0.004, p < 0.001) (paired samples t test). 2D-DCNN trained on DBT (with transfer learning) achieved higher accuracy than those on FFDM (malignant: Delta AUC = 0.014 +/- 0.014, p = 0.037; benign: Delta AUC = 0.031 +/- 0.006, p < 0.001; normal: Delta AUC = 0.017 +/- 0.004, p < 0.001) (independent samples t test). The 2D-DCNN employing both DBT and FFDM for training achieved better performances in benign (FFDM: Delta AUC = 0.010 +/- 0.008, p < 0.001; DBT: Delta AUC = 0.009 +/- 0.005, p < 0.001) and normal (FFDM: Delta AUC = 0.005 +/- 0.003, p < 0.001; DBT: Delta AUC = 0.002 +/- 0.002, p < 0.001) (related samples Friedman test). The 3D-DCNN and 2D-DCNN trained from scratch with DBT only produced moderate classification. Conclusions Transfer learning facilitates mass classification for both DBT and FFDM, and DBT outperforms FFDM when equipped with transfer learning. Integrating DBT and FFDM in DCNN training enhances mass classification accuracy for breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据