4.7 Article

Sampling the μνSSM for displaced decays of the tau left sneutrino LSP at the LHC

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 79, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7412-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [FPA2015-65929-P, PGC2018-095161-B-I00]
  2. IFT Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa [SEV-2016-0597]
  3. Fundacion La Caixa under 'La Caixa-Severo Ochoa' international predoctoral grant
  4. IBS [IBS-R018-D1]
  5. Argentinian CONICET
  6. Spanish Grant (MINECO/FEDER, UE) [FPA2015-65929-P]
  7. Elusives ITN (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant) [674896]
  8. SOM Sabor y origen de la Materia [FPA 2017-85985-P]
  9. Spanish MINECO Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa del IFIC program [SEV-2014-0398]
  10. Spanish Red Consolider MultiDark [FPA2017-90566-REDC]
  11. [17K14270]
  12. [18H05542]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the framework of the mu nu SSM, a displaced dilepton signal is expected at the LHC from the decay of a tau left sneutrino as the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) with a mass in the range 45-100 GeV. We compare the predictions of this scenario with the ATLAS search for long-lived particles using displaced lepton pairs in pp collisions, considering an optimization of the trigger requirements by means of a high level trigger that exploits tracker information. The analysis is carried out in the general case of three families of right-handed neutrino superfields, where all the neutrinos get contributions to their masses at tree level. To analyze the parameter space, we sample the mu nu SSM for a tau left sneutrino LSP with proper decay length c tau>0.1mm using a likelihood data-driven method, and paying special attention to reproduce the current experimental data on neutrino and Higgs physics, as well as flavor observables. The sneutrino is special in the mu nu SSM since its couplings have to be chosen so that the neutrino oscillation data are reproduced. We find that important regions of the parameter space can be probed at the LHC run 3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据