4.5 Article

Human Endometrial Exosomes Contain Hormone-Specific Cargo Modulating Trophoblast Adhesive Capacity: Insights into Endometrial-Embryo Interactions

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.134890

关键词

embryo implantation; endometrium; estrogen; exosomes; microenvironment; pregnancy; progesterone; proteomics; trophoblast

资金

  1. NHMRC project [1057741]
  2. Victorian Governments Operational Infrastructure funding
  3. NHMRC Fellowship [1002028]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1057741] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embryo implantation into receptive endometrium requires synergistic endometrial-blastocyst interactions within the uterine cavity and is essential for establishing pregnancy. We demonstrate that exosomes (40-150 nm nanovesicles) released from endometrial epithelial cells are an important component of these interactions. We defined the proteome of purified endometrial epithelial-derived exosomes (Exos) influenced by menstrual cycle hormones estrogen (E; proliferative phase) and estrogen plus progesterone (EP; receptive phase) and examined their potential to modify trophoblast function. E-/EP-Exos were uniquely enriched with 254 and 126 proteins, respectively, with 35% newly identified proteins not previously reported in exosome databases. Importantly, EP-Exos protein cargo was related to fundamental changes in implantation: adhesion, migration, invasion, and extracellular matrix remodeling. These findings from hormonally treated ECC1 endometrial cancer cells were validated in human primary uterine epithelial cell-derived exosomes. Functionally, exosomes were internalized by human trophoblast cells and enhanced their adhesive capacity, a response mediated partially through active focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling. Thus, exosomes contribute to the endometrialembryo interactions within the human uterine microenvironment essential for successful implantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据