4.2 Article

A Novel Reduced-Toxicity Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen Using Full-Dose Busulfan, Fludarabine, and Melphalan for Single Cord Blood Transplantation Provides Durable Engraftment and Remission in Nonremission Myeloid Malignancies

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 1844-1850

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.06.017

关键词

Reduced-toxicity myeloablative regimen; Intravenous busulfan; Cord blood transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pilot study of a novel, reduced-toxicity, myeloablative conditioning regimen using intravenous busulfan 12.8 mg/kg, fludarabine 180 mg/m(2), and melphalan 80 mg/m(2) for single cord blood transplantation (CBT) was conducted at our institution. Fifty-one patients with myeloid malignancies not in remission were included in this study. Their median age was 59 years (range, 19 to 70 years), with a median hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index score of 3. With a median observation period of 39.6 months (range, 24.3 to 90.8 months) among the survivors, overall survival and progression-free survival at 2 years were both 54.9%. Forty-six of 51 achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 19.5 days (range, 13 to 38 days) after transplantation, with a cumulative incidence of 90.2%. No patient developed graft rejection in this study. All patients who achieved engraftment showed hematological complete remission with complete donor chimerism. Eleven patients relapsed at a median of 4.9 months (range,.5 to 26.7 months). Cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 2 years were 11.8% and 25.5%, respectively. In conclusion, the present results show that the novel conditioning regimen for single CBT provided durable engraftment and remission with acceptable NRM leading to excellent survival, even for a relatively older population with myeloid malignancies not in remission. (C) 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据