4.7 Article

Optimal extended warranty strategy: Offering trade-in service or not?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 278, 期 1, 页码 240-254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.015

关键词

Supply chain management; Extended warranty; Trade-in service; Warranty selling price; Trade-in price

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71571115, 71671108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retailers and manufacturers are increasingly selling extended warranties to obtain high profitability. In addition to the traditional extended warranty (EWR), that offers a free repair and replacement service, a new extended warranty (EWT) comes to the market, under which an additional trade-in service is provided during the warranty coverage. The service provider faces three important decisions: (1) Whether to offer EWR or EWT? (2) How to set the optimal selling prices of EWR and EWT? (3) When choosing to sell EWT, how to determine the optimal trade-in price? To address such challenging issues, we first develop two theoretical models regarding EWR and EWT for a retailer, and further consider the cases where a manufacturer sells the extended warranties and the upgraded product has different failure probabilities. The results show that EWT should never be offered at a higher price than EWR, and when the handling cost for used products is relatively low, EWT will outperform EWR. While the optimal EWR and EWT selling prices increase with the product failure probability, the optimal trade-in price decreases with it. Interestingly, the optimal trade-in discount is not always increasing or decreasing with the failure probability. Moreover, an earlier trade-in time is usually better for the service provider. Compared with the retailer, the manufacturer will always set a lower warranty selling price, but neither of them will always offer a lower trade-in price or discount. We also find that the upgraded product's failure probability will affect the retailer's optimal warranty strategy and profit. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据