4.7 Article

Double-cropping systems based on rye, maize and sorghum: Impact of variety and harvesting time on biomass and biogas yield

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.125934

关键词

Double-cropping; Single-cropping; Sorghum; Crop maturity; Crop rotation; Anaerobic digestion

类别

资金

  1. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change affects the frequency and intensity of extreme weather, the results of which include production losses and climate-induced crop productivity fluctuations. Double-cropping systems (DCSs) have been suggested as a way to increase biomass-production while simultaneously delivering environmental benefits. In a three-year field-test, two DCSs based on maize and sorghum as the main crop and rye as the preceding winter crop were compared with each other and compared with 2 single-cropping systems (SCSs) of maize or sorghum; there were comparisons of growth dynamics, optimal harvesting and growing time as well as biomass and methane yield. In addition, the impact of variety and harvest time on the winter rye optimal biomass yield was studied. The experiments clearly showed the superiority of the DCS over the SCS. Within the DCS, the rye/sorghum combination achieved significantly higher biomass yields compared to those of the rye/maize combination. The highest dry matter biomass yield was achieved during year 1 at 27.5 +/- 2.4 t.ha(-1), during which winter rye contributed 8.3 +/- 0.7 t.ha(-1) and sorghum contributed 19.2 +/- 1.8 t.ha(-1). At the experimental location, which is influenced by a Pannonia climate (hot and dry), the rye/sorghum DCS was able to obtain average methane yields per hectare, 9300 m(3), whereas the rye/maize combination reached 7400 m(3). In contrast, the rye, maize and sorghum SCSs achieved methane yields of 4800, 6100 and 6500 m(3) ha(-1), respectively. The study revealed that the winter rye and sorghum DCS is a promising strategy to counteract climate change and thus guarantee crop yield stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据