4.0 Article

The ecology of Dickinsonia on tidal flats

期刊

ESTUDIOS GEOLOGICOS-MADRID
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC
DOI: 10.3989/egeol.43587.571

关键词

Dickinsonia; Tidal-flat; Central Urals; Ediacaran; Russia

类别

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [17-17-01241]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant [19-05-00828]
  3. NERC [NE/S014756/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Russian Science Foundation [17-17-01241] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specimens of Dickinsonia from the Central Urals are characterised by clear bilateral symmetry. Taking into account observations from Australian specimens, we consider that the so called 'glide reflection symmetry' in these fossils is a taphonomic phenomenon. The size frequency distribution plot shows the predominance of smaller individuals in the studied population of Dickinsonia from the Central Urals. Assuming that the age of an individual is manifested in the body size, there is a significant predominance of juvenile individuals in the population. Three possible scenarios can be envisaged: (i) the population has a large number of juvenile individuals as the result of high survivorship rate in the intertidal zone; (ii) the population teems with juvenile forms because it is buried immediately after hatching; (iii) assuming that Dickinsonia was an actively motile organisms, that abundance of juvenile individuals could be explained by their inability to escape burial (although it is difficult to imagine that some of the mature individuals are buried with signs of escape behaviour); and (iv) the population could be interpreted as a fossilised 'nesting ground' for Dickinsonia in the intertidal zone where juvenile forms underwent maturation before migrating back to the subtidal zone. The study population can be characterised as expanding or stable; therefore, the intertidal setting can be described as favourable for these organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据