4.6 Article

Potential impact of harvesting management measures on the reproductive parameters of the limpets Patella aspera and Patella candei from Madeira Island

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106264

关键词

Limpets; Size-structure; Sex ratio; Harvesting; Management measures; North-eastern atlantic

资金

  1. FCT [SFRH/BSAB/143056/2018, UID/MAR/04292/2019]
  2. UE FEDER [MARISCOMAC-MAC/2.3d/097, MACAROFOOD-MAC/2.3d/015]
  3. Regional Government of Madeira
  4. [ARDITI 00M/2016/010 (M1420-01-0145-FEDER000001)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intertidal and shallow subtidal molluscs are highly sensitive to overharvesting because of their restricted habitat, limited mobility and easy access to humans. Several parameters have been previously used to determine their exploitation status, e.g. sizes, abundances and reproductive stages. Herein the reproductive parameters of two exploited limpets, Patella candei and the protandrous hermaphrodite Patella aspera were examined. Limpets were collected before (1996-2006) and after (2007-2017) the implementation of management measures aiming to preserve limpet populations in Madeira Island (NE Atlantic Ocean). The proportion of reproductive individuals increased approximately 14% after the implementation of management measures for both species. An increase in the size and age at first maturity of both species (from 34.6 to 37.5 mm in P. aspera and from 33.4 to 37.4 mm in P. candei) also occurred after such implementation. Before samples of P. aspera showed male biased populations (1.7:1) shifting towards a balanced sex ratio (1:1) after the regulations. No before nor after sex ratio variations were observed in P. candei populations. Reproductive parameters revealed feasible to determine the efficiency of the implementation of management measures and to detect a slight improvement in reproductive potential of both limpet species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据