4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of PVDF/CaCO3 composite membranes etched by hydrochloric acid

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 32, 页码 33607-33620

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06402-5

关键词

Polyvinylidene fluoride; Etched membranes; Calciumcarbonate; Hydrochloric acid; Pore size; Porosity; Vacuum membrane distillation

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20170540685, 201402117]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [201706163]
  3. Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to improve the pore size, porosity, and hydrophobicity of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes for desalination by vacuum membrane distillation (VMD). New membranes were prepared via etching PVDF/calcium carbonate (CaCO3) composite membranes using hydrochloric acid (HCl), depending on the chemical reaction of CaCO3 and HCl. Etched membranes were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), contact angle (CA), atomic force microscope (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that CaCO3 of composite membranes was completely reacted by 1.5 mol/L HCl after composite membranes had been etched 90 min. The crystallinity of etched membranes was the same as that of PVDF/CaCO3 composite membranes, and no new functional groups appeared in etched membranes, which indicated that etched membranes had good chemical stability. The surface roughness increased and led to the increase of contact angle, which means the hydrophobicity of etched membranes was enhanced. As a result, the increment of permeation flux had been improved in a VMD process. It was found that the maximum flux of etched membrane was enhanced and up to 1.65 times of composite membrane when the concentration of sodium chloride (NaCl) solution was 5.0 wt%, and the maximum flux reached up to 30.9 kg m(-2) h(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据