4.6 Article

Size-dependent vibration and stability of moderately thick functionally graded micro-plates using a differential quadrature-based geometric mapping scheme

期刊

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 339-365

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2019.08.014

关键词

Differential quadrature-based geometric mapping scheme; Couple stress; Plate element; Vibration and stability; Moderately thick FG micro-plates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11602204, 11502218]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Southwest Jiaotong University (SWJTU) [2682016CX096, 2682017QY03]
  4. Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong [ITP/020/18LP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a novel differential quadrature-based geometric mapping scheme to address the C-1-continuity requirements of the in-plane and out-of-plane kinematic quantities of a couple stress-based Mindlin-Reissner functionally graded (FG) plate model. This mapping scheme is combined with the minimum total potential energy principle to construct a four-node size-dependent plate element being free of shape functions with 20 degrees of freedom (DOFs) per node. To validate the convergence and adaptability of the element formulation derived, a wide range of numerical examples regarding the free vibration and stability problems of FG macro-/micro-plates are presented. Finally, parametric studies are carried out to investigate the influences of material and geometrical parameters on the vibration and stability behavior of moderately thick FG micro-plates. It is shown that the developed element possesses distinct advantages over the corresponding shape function-based element in terms of convergence and computational accuracy, which can lead to a remarkable reduction of the number of meshes employed. Besides, the size-dependence of vibration and buckling mode shapes is exhibited in the form of displacement contour plots for the first time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据