4.6 Article

Atomic layer deposition and structure optimization of ultrathin Nb2O5 films on carbon nanotubes for high-rate and long-life lithium ion storage

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135268

关键词

Ultrathin Nb2O5 films; Carbon nanotubes; Atomic layer deposition; Post deposition annealing; Fast lithium ion storage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61674085]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Nankai University [023-63185006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Niobium pentoxides (Nb2O5) as anode materials has attracted tremendous research interest due to its great potential in rate capability and cyclic durability. Nevertheless, the low electrical conductivity and weak structural controllability of Nb2O5 hinders its practical application. Herein, amorphous Nb2O5 thin films are conformally deposited on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by controlled atomic layer deposition (ALD) and three types of crystalline Nb2O5@CNTs composites are obtained by post-deposition annealing. Moreover, the effects of deposition temperature and annealing temperature on the crystal structure and surface morphology of Nb2O5@CNTs are investigated. Based on these, the electrochemical performances of Nb2O5@CNTs composites as anode materials are compared in lithium half cells. Impressively, ultrathin and uniform Nb2O5 nanocrystal film with hexagonal (TT) phase on CNTs delivers a capacity of 325.1 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 A g(-1). Even at a high current density of 3 A g(-1), a stable capacity of 170 mAh g(-1) is still achieved over 4000 cycles. Its high-rate and long-life lithium ion storage is mainly attributed to the synergistic effects of carbon nanotubes, TT-phase Nb2O5, and ultrathin film structure. Therefore, this synthetic strategy facilitates the development of Nb2O5 as anode materials for high-rate and long-life lithium/sodium ion batteries. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据