4.6 Article

Double-shelled hollow carbon spheres confining tin as high- performance electrodes for lithium ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 321, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134672

关键词

Negative electrode; Hollow structure; Long cycling; Structure design; Tin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602167, 21601098]
  2. Shandong Provincial Science Foundation [ZR2016EMB07, ZR2017JL021]
  3. Key Research and Development Program [2018GGX102033]
  4. Qingdao Applied Fundamental Research Project [16-5-1-92-jch, 17-1-1-81-jch]
  5. Distinguished Taishan Scholar project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alloy-type materials hold a great potential as the negative electrodes for next generation lithium-ion batteries with high energy and low cost. However, the huge volume expansion of alloy-type materials caused by lithium alloying inevitably leads to poor cycle stability. Herein, we propose a rational design of a sandwich structure of carbon/Sn/carbon hollow spheres by a template-engaged method. The structure effect of the novel carbon/Sn/carbon spheres on the lithium storage performances is elucidated by various means of characterization and electrochemical tests. A stable and high reversible capacity of 1100 mA h g(-1) is retained after 130 cycles at 0.1 A g(-1), significantly higher than that (187 mA h g(-1) ) of Sn/carbon hollow spheres. Furthermore, a superior rate capability is obtained for carbon/Sn/carbon spheres, e.g., showing a high capacity of 430 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1). The excellent electrochemical properties of carbon/Sn/carbon against Sn/carbon are ascribed to a unique nano-confinement from the double-shelled carbons with very good structure stability and contribution of pseudocapacitive storage of lithium. These results indicate that the sandwich structure of carbon/Sn/carbon is highly effective to design electrode materials with enhanced performances. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据