4.7 Article

ROS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome priming and activation mediate PCB 118-induced pyroptosis in endothelial cells

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109937

关键词

Polychlorinated biphenyls; 2,3 ',4,4 ',5 pentachlorobiphenyl; Pyroptosis; NLRP3 inflammasome; Endothelial dysfunction; Reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81741122]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of the SiChuan Provincial Education Department [17ZA0450]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing epidemiological evidence has shown that exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is harmful to the cardiovascular system. However, how PCB 118-induced oxidative stress mediates endothelial dysfunction is not fully understood. Here, we explored whether and how PCB 118 exposure-induced oxidative stress leads to NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pyroptosis in endothelial cells. As expected, PCB 118 was cytotoxic to HUVECs and induced caspase-1 activation and cell membrane disruption, which are characteristics of pyroptosis. Moreover, PCB 118-induced pyroptosis may have been due to the activation of the NLRP3 infammasomes. PCB 118 also induced excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HUVECs. The ROS scavenger (+/-)-alpha-tocopherol and the NF kappa B inhibitor BAY11-7082 reversed the upregulation of NLRP3 expression and the increase in NLRP3 inflammasome activation induced by PCB 118 exposure in HUVECs. Additionally, PCB 118-induced oxidative stress and pyroptosis were dependent on Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation and subsequent cytochrome P450 1A1 upregulation, which we confirmed by using the AhR selective antagonist CH 223191. These data suggest that PCB 118 exposure induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation and subsequently leads to pyroptosis in endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. AhR-mediated ROS production play a central role in PCB 118-induced pyroptosis by priming NF kappa B-dependent NLRP3 expression and promoting inflammasome activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据