4.8 Article

The many dimensions of phytochemical diversity: linking theory to practice

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 16-32

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13422

关键词

Beta diversity; chemical ecology; functional diversity; Phytochemical diversity; plant secondary metabolism; plant-insect interactions; scale; species interactions; trait variability

类别

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2018-67013-28065, 2018-07366]
  2. Department of Biological Sciences at Virginia Tech
  3. MSU AgBioResearch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on the ecological and evolutionary roles of phytochemicals has recently progressed from studying single compounds to examining chemical diversity itself. A key conceptual advance enabling this progression is the use of species diversity metrics for quantifying phytochemical diversity. In this perspective, we extend the theory developed for species diversity to further our understanding of what exactly phytochemical diversity is and how its many dimensions impact ecological and evolutionary processes. First, we discuss the major dimensions of phytochemical diversity - richness, evenness, functional diversity, and alpha, gamma and beta diversity. We describe their potential independent roles in biotic interactions and the practical challenges associated with their analysis. Second, we re-analyse the published and unpublished datasets to reveal that the phytochemical diversity experienced by an organism (or observed by a researcher) depends strongly on the scale of the interaction and the total amount of phytochemicals involved. We argue that we must account for these frames of reference to meaningfully understand diversity. Moving from a general notion of phytochemical diversity as a single measure to a precise definition of its multidimensional and multiscale nature yields overlooked testable predictions that will facilitate novel insights about the evolutionary ecology of plant biotic interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据