4.7 Article

Bacterial alkaline phosphomonoesterase in the rhizospheres of plants grown in Chilean extreme environments

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 52, 期 6, 页码 763-773

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-016-1113-9

关键词

Bacterial communities; Extreme environments; Alkaline phosphomonoesterase; Rhizosphere; Soil

资金

  1. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
  2. FONDECYT [3140620, 1120505]
  3. Chilean Government [USA2013-0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial alkaline phosphomonoesterases (APases) are relevant for organic phosphorus (Po) recycling in many soils. However, the abundance and diversity of bacterial APase in the rhizospheres of native plants are poorly known, particularly in extreme environments. In this research work, we studied the composition of total and APase-harboring bacterial communities, abundances of selected APase genes (phoD and phoX), and APase activities in rhizosphere soils from native plants grown in extreme environments of northern (Atacama Desert), central (Andes volcano; Quetrupillan and Mamuil Malal) and hot spring (Liquie), and southern polar (Patagonia and Antarctic) regions of Chile. Differences in the composition of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soils were revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), phoD, and phoX genes. In general, the significant lowest bacterial diversities, APase gene abundances, and APase activities were observed in rhizosphere soils from Atacama Desert, whereas the highest values were observed in rhizosphere soils of Patagonia. In addition, APase gene abundances were positively correlated among them and with APase activity of rhizosphere soils, but negatively correlated with phosphorus (P) availability in rhizosphere soils. Although bacterial APases were observed in all studied rhizosphere soils, their relevance to soil Po recycling in soils of extreme environments remains unclear and further studies are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据