4.5 Article

Longitudinal study revealing motor, cognitive and behavioral decline in a transgenic minipig model of Huntington's disease

期刊

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.041293

关键词

Huntington's disease; Large animal model; Phenotyping; Motor; Cognitive and behavioral studies

资金

  1. Ministerstvo Skolstvi, Mladeze a Telovychovy (National Sustainability Programme) [LO1609]
  2. CHDI foundation [RA: A11609]
  3. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TJ02000092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Huntington's disease (HD) is an inherited devastating neurodegenerative disease with no known cure to date. Several therapeutic treatments for HD are in development, but their safety, tolerability and efficacy need to be tested before translation to bedside. The monogenetic nature of this disorder has enabled the generation of transgenic animal models carrying a mutant huntingtin (mHTT) gene causing HD. A large animal model reflecting disease progression in humans would be beneficial for testing the potential therapeutic approaches. Progression of the motor, cognitive and behavioral phenotype was monitored in transgenic Huntington's disease minipigs (TgHD) expressing the N-terminal part of human mHTT. New tests were established to investigate physical activity by telemetry, and to explore the stress-induced behavioral and cognitive changes in minipigs. The longitudinal study revealed significant differences between 6- to 8-year-old TgHD animals and their wild-type (WT) controls in a majority of the tests. The telemetric study showed increased physical activity of 4.6- to 6.5-year-old TgHD boars compared to their WT counterparts during the lunch period as well as in the afternoon. Our phenotypic study indicates progression in adult TgHD minipigs and therefore this model could be suitable for longstanding preclinical studies of HD. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据