4.5 Article

The effects of DPP4 inhibitors on the levels of plasma catecholamines and their metabolites in patients with type 2 diabetes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107832

关键词

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4; Catecholamines; Sympathetic nervous system; Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health Welfare, Korea [HI14C1135, HI16C1997]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4Is) can increase sympathetic activity. We aimed to evaluate the direct association between serum DPP4 activity and sympathetic activity in humans. Methods: Fasting serum DPP4 activity and plasma levels of catecholamines and their metabolites were measured in 211 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with DPP4I (n = 146) or non-DPP4I therapy (n = 65) and in healthy control subjects (n = 30). Results: Although there were no differences in plasma levels of catecholamines and their metabolites between the DPP4I and non-DPP4I groups, the levels in both of these groups were lower than those in the healthy control group. In DPP4I-treated patients, serum DPP4 activity showed an inverse correlation with plasma levels of norepinephrine (NE) (r = -0.339, p < 0.01), metanephrine (MET) (r = -0.251, p < 0.01) and normetanephrine (r = -0.312, p < 0.001). In addition, plasma MET level showed a weak inverse correlation with serum DPP4 activity in the combined T2DM group. In DPP4I-treated patients, the inverse correlation between DPP4 activity and plasma NE remained significant even after multiple adjustments. Conclusions: Our results suggest that although sympathetic activity is lower in patients with T2DM, the greater the suppression of DPP4 activity by DPP4I therapy, the greater the increase in sympathetic activity is, which may have clinical implications in high risk T2DM patients. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据