4.5 Article

Synthesis of trace element Si and Sr codoping hydroxyapatite with non-cytotoxicity and enhanced cell proliferation and differentiation

期刊

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
卷 174, 期 1, 页码 208-217

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-016-0697-0

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Codoping; Trace element; Si; Sr; Cell proliferation and differentiation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51232007, 51572283, 51072217]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08JC1420700, 11XD1405600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main inorganic minerals in natural bones are non-stoichiometric hydroxyapatite (HA, Ca-10[PO4](6)[OH](2)) doped with various trace elements, which may possess important biochemical effects. To investigate the functions of Sr and Si elements in human hard tissues, non-doped HA, trace Si doped HA, Si and Sr codoped HA with the concentration of natural bones are synthesized by hydrothermal method in this study. The samples are characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The biological activities are evaluated via cytotoxicity study, adhesion and proliferation of osteoblast measurement, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay. All the synthesized materials are HA phase, which have hierarchical structures with oriented HA nanorods assembled into the platy particles. These materials are non-cytotoxic against L929 cells line even at 400 mu g/ml powder suspension. The results clearly indicate that the proliferation of L929 cells increases with trace elements doping from trace Si-HA to Si + Sr-HA. The adhesion and proliferation of osteoblast measurement illustrates that proliferation of osteoblasts advances about 1.3 times for Si-HA and about 1.8 times for Si + Sr-HA compared with undoped HA. In general, Si-HA with trace Si element shows enhanced cell differentiation, and Si + Sr-HA dual-doped with Si and Sr elements presents increased biological activity compared with Si-HA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据