4.8 Article

Newly Identified Nematodes from Mono Lake Exhibit Extreme Arsenic Resistance

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 19, 页码 3339-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.024

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen Scholars Program
  2. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2016089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extremophiles have much to reveal about the biology of resilience, yet their study is limited by sampling and culturing difficulties [1-3]. The broad success and small size of nematodes make them advantageous for tackling these problems [4-6]. We investigated the arsenic-rich, alkaline, and hypersaline Mono Lake (CA, US) [7-9] for extremophile nematodes. Though Mono Lake has previously been described to contain only two animal species (brine shrimp and alkali flies) in its water and sediments [10], we report the discovery of eight nematode species from the lake, including microbe grazers, parasites, and predators. Thus, nematodes are the dominant animals of Mono Lake in species richness. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the nematodes originated from multiple colonization events, which is striking, given the young history of extreme conditions at Mono Lake [7, 11]. One species, Auanema sp., is new, culturable, and survives 500 times the human lethal dose of arsenic. Comparisons to two non-extremophile sister species [12] reveal that arsenic resistance is a common feature of the genus and a preadaptive trait that likely allowed Auanema to inhabit Mono Lake. This preadaptation may be partly explained by a variant in the gene dbt-1 shared with some Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations and known to confer arsenic resistance [13]. Our findings expand Mono Lake's ecosystem from two known animal species to ten, and they provide a new system for studying arsenic resistance. The dominance of nematodes in Mono Lake and other extreme environments and our findings of preadaptation to arsenic raise the intriguing possibility that nematodes are widely pre-adapted to be extremophiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据