4.6 Article

The relevance of alpha phase in human perception

期刊

CORTEX
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 249-268

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.012

关键词

Perception; Neural oscillations; EEG; Phase; Cross-validation; Individual variability

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (AEI/FEDER) [PSI2016-75558-P]
  2. AGAUR Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR856]
  3. Explora Ciencia [AEIePSI2015-72568-EXP]
  4. European Research Council [727595]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [727595] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neural oscillations in the low frequencies, roughly in the alpha band (alpha, 5-15 Hz), have been suggested to act as a gateway from sensation to perception. This hypothesis assumes discrete perception. In particular, the amplitude and the phase of the low frequency rhythm entails a cortical mechanism which paces the access of sensory information into the cognitive system. Evidence supporting this idea includes correlations between the phase of neural oscillations and behavioral performance in perception, spatial attention and working memory. Despite a widespread confidence in the theory, these findings have been mostly based on a varied range of exploratory approaches and inferential group statistics. Here, we aimed at validating the involvement of low frequency cortical rhythm in perception and at providing a clear-cut EEG analysis pipeline. Such an analytical pipeline should support the adoption of a hypothesis-driven framework for future replications and applications. The design, the analyses and the statistical power of the present experiment were based on prior studies in which phase opposition was successfully found. However, our results provide evidence for the involvement of pre-stimulus oscillatory alpha amplitude but not phase in perception. We discuss the null findings from the present study within the existing literature. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据