4.7 Article

Effects of calcium bicarbonate on the properties of ordinary Portland cement paste

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 591-600

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.262

关键词

Calcium bicarbonate; Calcium carbonate; Portland cement; Hydration; Compressive strength; Pore size

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFC0603004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678220]
  3. Program for Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province in China [CXTD2017088]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) [19IRTSTHN027]
  5. Engineering division in New York University Abu Dhabi, UAE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bicarbonates can be used as accelerators to enhance the early age properties of cementitious materials. Bicarbonates like KHCO3 and NaHCO3 could form strong alkali (KOH, NaOH) and cause potential risk of alkali-silica reaction. Ca(HCO3)(2) could serve as a better accelerator than these bicarbonates because of formation of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)(2), which are usually found in cementitious system. The effects of Ca (HCO3)(2) on the hydration and physical properties of OPC paste were studied through heat of hydration, setting time, extension degree, compressive strength, pore size distribution, TG-DTA, XRD and SEM tests. The results showed that Ca(HCO3)(2) can accelerate the formation of ettringite and CO2-AFm at the initial stage, and increase the early age strength of OPC paste. Besides, Ca(HCO3)(2) was found to accelerate the hydration of C3S and C2S at a later stage and modify the pore structure of OPC paste. The reaction between Ca(HCO3)(2) and portlandite formed CaCO3, which could fill the harmful pores in cement paste. The optimum content of Ca(HCO3)(2) was found to be 1% by weight of cement, and further increase of Ca(HCO3)(2) could decrease the compressive strength by increasing the harmful pores. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据