4.6 Review

Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm

期刊

BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 1877-1909

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12313

关键词

centre-periphery hypothesis; abundant-center model; ecological marginality; demography; meta-analysis; species distribution; rear-leading edge; genetic diversity; range limits

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [BES-2011-045169]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology through project CAMBIO [CGL2010-21642]
  3. University of Sassari
  4. Erasmus scholarship
  5. Pyrenean Institute of Ecology-CSIC [2013-1-IT2-ERA02-53132]
  6. United States National Science Foundation [DEB 0950171]
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The centre-periphery hypothesis' (CPH) is a long-standing postulate in ecology that states that genetic variation and demographic performance of a species decrease from the centre to the edge of its geographic range. This hypothesis is based on an assumed concordance between geographical peripherality and ecological marginality such that environmental conditions become harsher towards the limits of a species range. In this way, the CPH sets the stage for understanding the causes of distribution limits. To date, no study has examined conjointly the consistency of these postulates. In an extensive literature review we discuss the birth and development of the CPH and provide an assessment of the CPH by reviewing 248 empirical studies in the context of three main themes. First, a decrease in species occurrence towards their range limits was observed in 81% of studies, while only 51% demonstrated reduced abundance of individuals. A decline in genetic variation, increased differentiation among populations and higher rates of inbreeding were demonstrated by roughly one in two studies (47, 45 and 48%, respectively). However, demographic rates, size and population performance less often followed CPH expectations (20-30% of studies). We highlight the impact of important methodological, taxonomic, and biogeographical biases on such validation rates. Second, we found that geographic and ecological marginality gradients are not systematically concordant, which casts doubt on the reliability of a main assumption of the CPH. Finally, we attempt to disentangle the relative contribution of geographical, ecological and historical processes on the spatial distribution of genetic and demographic parameters. While ecological marginality gradients explain variation in species' demographic performance better than geographic gradients, contemporary and historical factors may contribute interactively to spatial patterns of genetic variation. We thereby propose a framework that integrates species' ecological niche characteristics together with current and past range structure to investigate spatial patterns of genetic and demographic variation across species ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据