4.7 Article

On the BFGS monolithic algorithm for the unified phase field damage theory

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112704

关键词

Phase-field; Damage; Fracture; BFGS method; Monolithic algorithm; Staggered solver

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678246, 51878294]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, China [2018ZC04]
  3. Funding for Central Universities, China [2018PY20]
  4. Australian Research Council via DECRA project [DE160100577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the popularity in modeling complex and arbitrary crack configurations in solids, phase-field damage models suffer from burdensome computational cost. This issue arises largely due to the robust but inefficient alternating minimization (AM) or staggered algorithm usually employed to solve the coupled damage-displacement governing equations Aiming to tackle this difficulty, we propose in this work, for the first time, to use the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) algorithm to solve in a monolithic manner the system of coupled governing equations, rather than the standard Newton one which is notoriously poor for problems involving non-convex energy functional. It is found that, the BFGS algorithm yields identical results to the AM/staggered solver, and is also robust for both brittle fracture and quasi-brittle failure with a single or multiple cracks. However, much less iterations are needed to achieve convergence. Furthermore, as the system matrix is less reformed per increment, the quasi-Newton monolithic algorithm is much more efficient than the AM/staggered solver. Representative numerical examples show that the saving in CPU time is about factor 3 similar to 7, and the larger the problem is, the more saving it gains. As the BFGS monolithic algorithm has been incorporated in many commercial software packages, it can be easily implemented and is thus attractive in the phase-field damage modeling of localized failure in solids. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据