4.4 Article

A potential biomarker for fatigue: Oxidative stress and anti-oxidative activity

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 88-93

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.05.005

关键词

Fatigue; Oxidative stress; Anti-oxidative activity

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology (Japan) [KAKENHI-24500826]
  2. Health Labour Sciences Research Grant (Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare) (Japan) [24163001]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H02502, 15K08616] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to determine whether oxidative stress and anti-oxidative activity could act as biomarkers that discriminate patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) from healthy volunteers at acute and sub-acute fatigue and resting conditions. We calculated the oxidative stress index (OSI) from reactive oxygen metabolites-derived compounds (d-ROMs) and the biological antioxidant potential (BAP). We determined changes in d-ROMs, BAP, and OSI in acute and sub-acute fatigue in two healthy groups, and compared their values at rest between patients with CFS (diagnosed by Fukuda 1994 criteria) and another group of healthy controls. Following acute fatigue in healthy controls, d-ROMs and OSI increased, and BAP decreased. Although d-ROMs and OSI were significantly higher after sub-acute fatigue, BAP did not decrease. Resting condition yielded higher d-ROMs, higher OSI, and lower BAP in patients with CFS than in healthy volunteers, but lower d-ROMs and OSI when compared with sub-acute controls. BAP values did not significantly differ between patients with CFS and controls in the sub-acute condition. However, values were significantly higher than in the resting condition for controls. Thus, measured of oxidative stress (d-ROMS) and anti-oxidative activity (BAP) might be useful for discriminating acute, sub-acute, and resting fatigue in healthy people from patients with CFS, or for evaluating fatigue levels in healthy people. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据