4.7 Article

Cure kinetics, morphology development, and rheology of a high-performance carbon-fiber-reinforced epoxy composite

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107300

关键词

Prepreg; Graphite-fiber-reinforced polymer; Epoxy resin; Curing kinetics

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology [HGERA8X]
  2. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) of South Africa [HGER74P]
  3. DST-CSIR National Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) is a thermosetting high-performance epoxy composite used in the manufacturing of advanced aircraft components. The curing kinetics and rheological characteristics can have a great effect on the macroscopic performance properties of the composite materials. Thus, understanding the curing reactions of CFRP is important to the development and optimization of composite manufacturing processes. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the cure characteristics of a commercially available epoxy prepeg (pre-impregnated carbon fiber) using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), rheology, and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The Ozawa and Kissinger methods are used to measure the activation energies of curing reactions. The DSC results show that the degree of curing is strongly affected by time, whereas rheological characteristics of the composite show that the gel temperature values and obtained gel point increase with the heating rate. On the other hand, the morphological study using IR microscopy reveals the phase homogeneity and resin infiltration in a three-dimensional crosslinked network of the cured epoxy prepreg when a lower heating rate is used. A lower heating rate (or slow curing process) allows the optimum intermixing of epoxy, thus promotes maximum epoxy infiltration inside the fiber reinforcement, which can improve the mechanical performance of the composite by reducing the deformation and residual stress during the curing process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据