4.7 Article

Investigation of mechanical properties and shrinkage of ultra-high performance concrete: Influence of steel fiber content and shape

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107021

关键词

Fibers; Ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs); Fiber-matrix bond; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2018YFC0705400]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [U1305243]
  3. Energy Consortium Research Center of Missouri ST [SMR-1406-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of steel fibers in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) plays a significant role in enhancing strength and toughness and restraining shrinkage. This paper investigates the effect of steel fiber content and shape on mechanical strength, toughness, and autogenous and drying shrinkage of UHPC. Three steel fiber shapes, including straight, corrugated, and hooked fibers, with volume fraction ranging from 0 to 3% were employed. Compressive, flexural, and fiber-matrix bond strengths were evaluated. A statistical quadratic model and the Composite Theory were employed to predict the flexural strength of UHPC. Test results indicated that the increase in fiber volume can enhance the compressive and flexural strengths of UHPC and reduce shrinkage. The optimum fiber content for strength and shrinkage was found at 2%, beyond which the strength was slightly increased and the shrinkage was slightly decreased. For a given fiber content, the use of hooked fibers was most efficient in improving fiber-matrix bond and flexural strengths and reducing shrinkage. The flexural strengths of UHPC made with various fiber contents and shapes can be predicted using the proposed quadratic model and the Composite Theory. The latter considers the primary parameters affecting performance, including bond strength, matrix properties, and fiber characteristics. Finally, several models were used to simulate autogenous shrinkage behavior of UHPC and optimal models were found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据