4.7 Article

Effect of interlocking structure on mechanical properties of bio-inspired nacreous composites

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111260

关键词

Bio-inspired composites; Strength and toughness; Topological interlocking; Analytical solution; Finite element analysis (FEA)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672014, 11672013, 11472025]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1104003]
  3. Aviation Science Foundation of China [28163701002]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
  5. Super Computing Center ScGrid/CNGrid of CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a biological material, nacre has attracted more and more attention because of its remarkable mechanical properties, which were generally attributed to the staggered brick and mortar structure. Recently, topological interlocking was believed to be one of the key mechanisms for the high toughness and strength of nacre. This paper aims at evaluating the mechanical behaviors of nacreous composites with interlocking structures, by a combination of analytical solution and numerical simulation. The elastic modulus, tensile strength and toughness of the composites are obtained as functions of the geometrical parameters, which are related to the waviness of the tablet. It is found that the elastic modulus of the nacreous composites increases with the increasing of tablet waviness, and there exists a critical angle for the interlocking structure where both high strength and toughness can be achieved. Furthermore, finite element analysis (FEA) shows that the interlocking angle of the tablets plays an important role in the brittle-to-ductile transition of the composites, and good agreement is obtained between the theoretical solutions and simulations. The results can potentially provide a guideline to the design and optimization of bio-inspired composites with interlocking structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据