4.5 Article

Is there association between stress and periodontitis?

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 2285-2294

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03083-9

关键词

Epidemiology; Psychological stress; Mental health; Periodontitis; Chronic periodontitis; Oral health

资金

  1. Research Support Foundation of the State of Bahia (FAPESB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brasilia, Brazil,
  3. Feira de Santana State University, Bahia, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective This study estimated the association between stress and periodontitis. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 621 individuals. Information about individuals was obtained through a questionnaire. Stress was evaluated using the Perceived Stress Scale. The diagnosis of periodontitis was based on a complete periodontal examination including clinical attachment level, probing depth, and bleeding on probing. Prevalence ratios (PR), crude and adjusted, and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated by Poisson regression analysis. Results In the final sample, 48.47% (301) of the individuals were classified as having stress, of which, 23.92% (72) had the diagnosis of periodontitis. Association measurements between stress and probing depth >= 4 mm (PRadjusted = 1.28, 95%CI [1.04 to 1.58]), stress and clinical attachment level >= 5 mm (PRadjusted = 1.15, 95%CI [1.01 to 1.31]), and stress and periodontitis (PRadjusted = 1.36, 95%CI [1.01 to 1.83]) showed that the frequency of these outcomes among those exposed to stress was 15-36% higher than those without the condition of stress, after adjustment for age, sex, schooling level, current smoking habit, pulmonary disease, and body mass index. Conclusions The findings showed positive association between exposure to stress and the presence of periodontitis, reaffirming the need to prevent and control stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据