4.7 Review

Burden of bacterial bloodstream infection-a brief update on epidemiology and significance of multidrug-resistant pathogens

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 151-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.10.031

关键词

Bacteraemia; Bacterial resistance; Bloodstream infection; Escherichia coli; ICIebsiella; Salmonella; Staphylococcus aureus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bloodstream infections comprise a wide variety of pathogens and clinical syndromes with considerable overlap with similar syndromes of non-bacteraemic infections and diverse risk factors, therapeutic implications and outcomes. Yet, this heterogeneous 'entity' has the advantage to be pathogen-defined compared with the broad and even more heterogeneous entity 'sepsis', and so has become helpful for clinicians and epidemiologists for research and surveillance purposes. The increasing availability of population-based and large multicentre well-defined cohort studies should allow us to assess with much confidence and in detail its burden, the significance of antimicrobial resistance, and areas of uncertainty regarding further epidemiological evolution and optimized treatment regimens. Aim: To review key aspects of bloodstream infection epidemiology and burden, and summarize recent news and questions concerning critical developments. Sources: Peer-reviewed articles based on the search terms 'bloodstream infection' and 'bacteremia' combined with the terms 'epidemiology' and 'burden'. The emphasis was on new information from studies in adult patients and on the added burden due to pathogen resistance to first- and second-line antimicrobial agents. Content: Topics covered include recent developments in the epidemiology of bloodstream infection due to key pathogens and published information about the relevance of resistance for patient outcomes. (C) 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据