4.5 Review

Immunological mechanisms underpinning faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 199, 期 1, 页码 24-38

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cei.13397

关键词

faecal microbiota transplantation; immunology; inflammatory bowel disease

资金

  1. Department of Health [EME/13/179/01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [EME/13/179/01] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal disease that results from a dysregulated immune response against specific environmental triggers in a genetically predisposed individual. Increasing evidence has indicated a causal role for changes in gut microbiota (dysbiosis) contributing to this immune-mediated intestinal inflammation. These mechanisms involve dysregulation of multiple facets of the host immune pathways that are potentially reversible. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of processed stool from a healthy donor into an individual with an illness. FMT has shown promising results in both animal model experiments and clinical studies in IBD in the resolution of intestinal inflammation. The underlying mechanisms, however, are unclear. Insights from these studies have shown interactions between modulation of dysbiosis via changes in abundances of specific members of the gut microbial community and changes in host immunological pathways. Unravelling these causal relationships has promising potential for a translational therapy role to develop targeted microbial therapies and understand the mechanisms that underpin IBD aetiopathogenesis. In this review, we discuss current evidence for the contribution of gut microbiota in the disruption of intestinal immune homeostasis and immunoregulatory mechanisms that are associated with the resolution of inflammation through FMT in IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据